Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 15:20

משום דאמר להו אי שתקיתו ושקליתו כדינייכו שקליתו ואי לא מהדרנא שטרא דזיבורית למריה ושקליתו כולכו מזיבורית

you state that, 'They all have stepped into the place of the original owner,' what need is there to mention one person purchasing all the estate by one and the same deed? It therefore seems pretty certain [that the estate disposed of to one person was effected by] deeds of different dates. But [then] why such a distinction?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., why should the legal position of one purchaser be worse than that of three? ');">¹⁸</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 15:20. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.